User talk:Tomtomn00/Archive1

Your sig

That's just obnoxious. There's no reason it needs to be that big. »ArceusInator 01:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

I don't see why we need custom sigs on talk pages relevant to only a few people anyway. Yours looks pretty big in the editor because of all those <font>s too. --SNCPlay42 04:38, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Yep, you people with long signatures need to put them into a template. They disrupt the flow when editing talk pages.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

08:19, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

I DID ITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT FINAALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLY!!!! I FIXED MY SIGNATURE INTO A TEMPLATE. :D - Quenty (talk • August 2)

I need a template in mine. ⇒Tom ⇒Tom ⇒N ⇒0 ⇒0 TELEPORT To... †Neverland! Posted: 15:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

I think I did a template.. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @

Oh no you di'int

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

20:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Is this it? ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @

Still no.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

12:53, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

How do I? ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 13:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Test ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @

JUST USE THE {{sigwrapper}} TEMPLATE!

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

13:21, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Test again. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @

Still wrong. You're not using the {{sigwrapper}} template. As a result, the date is not part of your sig.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

13:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Help/Redirect Comment

I can redirect to any page I want to as long as it has the relevant information in it. Relevant, that is, pertaining to the link.

(MrNicNac | Send Message | Wiki Editor/Reviewer) - (Writer/Editor List)

Curious.

Hey there. Just curious as to why you are adding move protection to pages. Only sysops can move pages, so there really isn't a need to add sysops only protection. Thanks!--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 18:24, 10 March 2012 (EST)

Just noticed that, sorry. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 08:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Don't use the "Cascading" option when protecting pages

It prevents writers from editing templates because their pages are also protected.

Merlin11188 | Talk | Send Message | E-mail | Wiki Writer

04:25, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I shall take that into mind.~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 17:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Better idea: don't protect pages at all. The only pages I think should be protected are the pages on the MediaWiki namespace and the main page.

JulienDethurens

13 March 2012

Agreed

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

20:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm kind of with the idea, however protection would be needed if the Wiki ever goes public again. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 20:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

If it ever goes public again, then we will protect pages. But we don't need to protect anything right now.

JulienDethurens

13 March 2012

Rejecting Changes

You rejected two changes without explaining why and I really have no idea why you rejected them... I put them back, because, to me, they seem completely normal..

JulienDethurens

15 March 2012

He is a newbie at this kind of thing. :D - Quenty (talk • March 15)

I'm going to start leaving an edit summary. You REMOVED the link. Also, there is a note at the top asking for you not to mess with the subpage. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 16:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

I didn't remove the link, links, if not put between brackets, are automatically linked to. I've even looked at the preview of both versions and they were completely identical... As for the box, it was added after this.

JulienDethurens

16 March 2012

I added the note, and I trust Julien to make things work out OK, because he's my 'Roblox friend'. Just stop arguing. What has been done, has been done. - Quenty (talk • March 16)

Protecting Pages

Why are you protecting pages? First, you were protecting pages so that only sysops could move them, but only sysops can move page already, so it's pointless. Now, you're protecting pages so only users can edit them, but that's already the case too..

I don't understand what you're trying to do... Besides, only pages used by MediaWiki should be protected... --JulienDethurens 17:16, 21 March 2012 (EDT)

If I sysop-edit-protect a page, it will automatically be move protected. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 16:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC) 12:33, 22 March 2012 (EDT)

The point is, that they are already move protected from anyone but a sysop. †MrNicNac - Wiki Editor †

Wikipedia and Other Wikis

I don't mean to sound aggressive or anything, but you don't need to "brag" about being a Wikipedia Bureaucrat and Admin, you know.. --JulienDethurens 19:47, 25 March 2012 (EDT)

Been trying to fix that, for a LONG time.. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 15:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Don't review user subpages

I just noticed that you have previously reviewed my scripting guide, and I would just like to tell you that you shouldn't review pages in the user namespace, or any other namespace than the main one. Actually, you shouldn't even review pages at all, unless they are already reviewed and have pending changes, as the reviewing system is going to be removed.

Anyways, just wondering, why did you even review it at all..? --JulienDethurens 17:53, 27 March 2012 (EDT)

I guess that's up to the admins to decide. --JulienDethurens 18:27, 27 March 2012 (EDT)

Where did you hear about removing the reviewing system? †MrNicNac - Wiki Editor †

Anaminus said it was going to be removed and to not review any new pages until it is removed. --JulienDethurens 20:36, 27 March 2012 (EDT)

Sure, I shall not review more pages, unless it's my userpage to remove the Pending Changes bar. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 16:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

I did say not to review any unreviewed pages, but I never said it was going to be removed. --Anaminus 14:07, 28 March 2012 (EDT)

Why are you protecting templates and images on a SECURE Wiki? That is completely pointless. Just because you can, does not mean you need to. †MrNicNac - Senior Wiki Editor †

Yeah this is getting really annoying now, I don't even edit the wiki much anymore, and even I'm noticing it.

Trappingnoobs (Writer) Have I done something bad? Good? Tell me on my talk page 13:39, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

If you wish, I'll stop. :/ ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 13:46, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

I agree. Templates don't need to be protected, actually, nothing needs to be protected except the pages used by MediaWiki, which are all already protected. Just don't protect anything at all. Especially not the documentation of templates, since template documentation is definitely the last thing that needs to be protected. --JulienDethurens 16:53, 5 April 2012 (EDT)