User talk:NecroBumpist

RE: RE: Since when was the and operator similar to the or operator? They're completely different

I see, next time explain how they are similar otherwise people like me might get confused.

(SoulStealer9875, Send Message, Scripting Book, My Profile)

08:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Your signature

Don't make it say "Me". That's just stupid.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

17:31, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

But I like itNecroBumpist 20:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

But it's misleading. If you really want to, you could add an if to check whether it is your user page, in which case "Me" would be acceptable.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

20:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm no where near good enough with web languages to do that lol. I considered stealing your signature (because it's nice), but I'm unsure of a few things, so I'll stick with this basic one. NecroBumpist 21:04, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Message

Did you read what I posted here? [[1]]

Trappingnoobs (Writer) Have I done something bad? Good? Tell me on my talk page 21:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

No, I've never really used a Wiki before, so I'm still figuring the syntax out. Thanks for the tip, I'll add that. NecroBumpist 21:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

"Note, none of the comments you moved exceeded the norm of 80 chars wide"

When you've got two parallel columns, such as with {{code and output}}, you have only 40 to play with.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

21:27, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

A norm of 80 characters wide? Oh, that "rule" I've heard about many times? Yeah, that's the reason word wrapping was invented, you know. Why wrap it yourself and possibly waste precious space when you can just let the browser do it correctly? --JulienDethurens 17:40, 15 April 2012 (EDT)

"Fixing dead links"

Just so you know, there's nothing actually wrong with red links, unless they're linking to an article that will either obviously never be created, either shouldn't be created at all. I think a pages on bugs would actually be welcome, so I don't think removing links to it is a good idea. A better idea would be to write that article.

I understand it may be tempting to remove links that can be considered as "dead" or "broken", but, really, what they are is just links to pages that don't exist and that creating might benefit to the wiki. However, if the red link is a link to a page that doesn't belong in the wiki or that is just too specific to ever get created, then delete it. --JulienDethurens 23:51, 15 April 2012 (EDT)