Talk:RBX.lua.Authoring (Object): Difference between revisions
From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>Camoy No edit summary |
>NXTBoy No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I don't think Authoring should be its own Object, being that it exists only in settings() and cannot be instantiated. None of the other settings singletons have their own "object" page, maybe they should have a unique layout. What do you think? <sup><small><font color="grey">[[User:Camoy|Camoy]] • [[Special:Contributions/Camoy|Contribs]] (December 23 2010)</font></small></sup> | ::I don't think Authoring should be its own Object, being that it exists only in settings() and cannot be instantiated. None of the other settings singletons have their own "object" page, maybe they should have a unique layout. What do you think? <sup><small><font color="grey">[[User:Camoy|Camoy]] • [[Special:Contributions/Camoy|Contribs]] (December 23 2010)</font></small></sup> | ||
::If <code>settings():isA("Instance")</code> is true, then it should be documented as an Instance. Also, be wary of using the 'new' system. There is My System, and then there is The Old System. Don't incur my wrath. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=21:36, 23 December 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 21:36, 23 December 2010
This needs the object format. Emess talk 20:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- Just further explaining what Emess said, this needs to be done correctly. Don't edit pages with a new format if you did not learn the format yet.
- If
settings():isA("Instance")is true, then it should be documented as an Instance. Also, be wary of using the 'new' system. There is My System, and then there is The Old System. Don't incur my wrath.
- If
