Talk:Groups: Difference between revisions

From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>Itunes89
>Trappingnoobs
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


:Shouldn't we combine this page with Group Admin? They both feature some of the same things. {{User:Shagabash/sig|date=23:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)}}
:Shouldn't we combine this page with Group Admin? They both feature some of the same things. {{User:Shagabash/sig|date=23:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)}}
== Images ==
Why are the images displaying a group name and such? Like Blocco said, they should be censored or changed so that they're not advertising a group, like something like "This is an example description". I don't think it's fair to use the wiki to advertise whatever "inEnterprise" is<div style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; color:#000000; font-size:10px">Trappingnoobs <span style="color:skyblue">(Writer)</span><span style="color:red"> Have I done something bad? Good? Tell me on my [[User_talk:Trappingnoobs|talk page]]</span><span style="color:grey;float:right">  22:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)</span></div>

Revision as of 22:43, 1 March 2012

New images that have been added

Should we update the pictures on this page? They are kind of outdated.--Itunes89 14:29, 29 February 2012 (EST)


Shan't they receive proper censorship of personal information (such as the description, ally groups, etc.) like the other previously added images?

Posted by blocco (talk) on Jul 28, 2011 (Thursday) at 23:35 (UTC) [Discuss format]
Shouldn't we combine this page with Group Admin? They both feature some of the same things.
Shagabash | PM | Talk | Contribs | 
23:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Images

Why are the images displaying a group name and such? Like Blocco said, they should be censored or changed so that they're not advertising a group, like something like "This is an example description". I don't think it's fair to use the wiki to advertise whatever "inEnterprise" is

Trappingnoobs (Writer) Have I done something bad? Good? Tell me on my talk page 22:43, 1 March 2012 (UTC)