Talk:Debounce

From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Revision as of 14:46, 30 July 2011 by >NXTBoy
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

I think this format (http://wiki.roblox.com/index.php?title=Debounce&oldid=39495) was nicer. Take out the inline comments, clean up that code/verbage, and I think I would like it better than the current revision. What are your thoughts? CamoyContribs (July 29 2011)

My main objection to that version was that a lot of the information was wrong or misleading. You can see the differences here. Not quite sure what you mean by "code/verbage"...
15:02, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Well some of the writing was inaccurate, and the code examples weren't the best they could be, however I think this page could have some major format changes (e.g. going back to the Example template, instead of pre). CamoyContribs (July 30 2011)
The example template looks aweful when used only to encapsulate for a single line of code. They need some explanation within them as well. The way I see it, it should only be used for supplementary content, which gives an example of how to use something described within the text, but isn't essential to understanding the document.
14:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)