Talk:Event

Oops. Maybe rename this "Events" since the page already exists. --GoldenUrg 05:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, this page shows up in the Category:Events page, which I don't want. How do I fix that? --GoldenUrg 05:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Using term "anonymous"

"Anonymous" doesn't sound right, when used in conjunction with the word "function." Is there a better substitute? Or is it just me?

^{Posted by blocco (talk) on Aug 14, 2011 (Sunday) at 17:31 (UTC) [Discuss format]}

"Anonymous function" is a commonly used term for functions that aren't given names, see Wikipedia --SNCPlay42 18:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Ah, k.

^{Posted by blocco (talk) on Aug 14, 2011 (Sunday) at 21:29 (UTC) [Discuss format]}

Change to object page?

Should we change this to an object page like format? (One for RBXScriptSignal and RBXScriptConnection) For one, it would look better and for two it's a lot easier to maintain a couple of method templates instead of this. You might say it's not an instance, but technically it is. It's just not a subclass of the instance class. I want input before I do this. Legend26 (talk | contribs) 15:54, 22 January 2012 (EST)

It would be easier to maintain and everything, but it isn't an instance, so we shouldn't put it on an instance page.

JulienDethurens

{{{1}}}

We could just have that in the description. I'm aiming for readability here. There are some edits that I need to make that wouldn't really look that good. Legend26 (talk | contribs) 15:58, 22 January 2012 (EST)

No. The object page format should be unique to objects. We want a clear distinction. This should take the same form as the CFrame and Vector3 pages. That's not to say that they can't be changed, but they should be consistent.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

21:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)