Talk:Bevels (Enum)

I think Doom decided that we're not making pages for enums that were only made for the settings. Since we (someone) are (eventually) writing pages for the settings, the enums can be mentioned there. --Anaminus 08:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure what you mean... I remember cleaning out some (but not all) of the Enum pages. Are you saying that this page needs to go or that it should stay? MINDRAKER 08:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Basically, yes, they should go. Any enum page where the enum is used for a setting (Bevels, Shadows, AASamples, etc) can be mentioned in on the related setting instead, since there's no chance that it will be used for different properties, like NormalId or TopBottom. --Anaminus 08:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

What about an entire enum page that we can attach to the settings? ⇒OutOfSpace 08:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

What about the Enum pages that have nothing linking to them? MINDRAKER 09:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)