Talk:Script Obfuscation

Not actual obfuscation

I just thought that I would let you know that from my perspective, obfuscation is not making machine code, but rather making code to be interpreted, but just harder to understand. Like jQuery, but in the minified form. I may be severely off, btw.

^{Posted by blocco (talk) on May 14, 2011 (Saturday) at 17:44 (UTC) [Discuss format]}

Obfuscation simply describes the act of making code hard to read. Normally, this consists of changing variable names (like jquery.min.js). However, this isn't exclusive.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

20:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

Okay.

^{Posted by blocco (talk) on May 15, 2011 (Sunday) at 01:54 (UTC) [Discuss format]}

There's a reason I put "" as the second argument sent to loadstring. It's because it needs to be there. It's the chunk's name.

Not sure I know exactly what you mean. Why does my method of skipping the loadstring step altogether not work?

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

22:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Loadstring has a second argument, which chooses the chunk's name. If you leave it as default, it will be the source of the code, which we certainly don't want.

JulienDethurens

7 February 2012