Talk:Script Obfuscation: Difference between revisions
From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>Blocco No edit summary |
>NXTBoy No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Obfuscation simply describes the act of making code hard to read. Normally, this consists of changing variable names (like jquery.min.js). However, this isn't exclusive. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=20:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)}} | :Obfuscation simply describes the act of making code hard to read. Normally, this consists of changing variable names (like jquery.min.js). However, this isn't exclusive. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=20:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)}} | ||
::Okay.<div style="border-style:dotted; border-width:0px; border-top-width:1px; border-color:#888888; padding-bottom:-4px;"><sup>Posted by [[:User:Blocco|blocco]] ([[:User_talk:Blocco|talk]]) on May 15, 2011 (Sunday) at 01:54 (UTC) [[:User talk:Blocco/sig#format|[Discuss format]]]</sup></div> | ::Okay.<div style="border-style:dotted; border-width:0px; border-top-width:1px; border-color:#888888; padding-bottom:-4px;"><sup>Posted by [[:User:Blocco|blocco]] ([[:User_talk:Blocco|talk]]) on May 15, 2011 (Sunday) at 01:54 (UTC) [[:User talk:Blocco/sig#format|[Discuss format]]]</sup></div> | ||
== There's a reason I put "" as the second argument sent to loadstring. It's because it needs to be there. It's the chunk's name. == | |||
Not sure I know exactly what you mean. Why does my method of skipping the loadstring step altogether not work?{{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=22:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
Revision as of 22:49, 6 February 2012
Not actual obfuscation
I just thought that I would let you know that from my perspective, obfuscation is not making machine code, but rather making code to be interpreted, but just harder to understand. Like jQuery, but in the minified form. I may be severely off, btw.
- Obfuscation simply describes the act of making code hard to read. Normally, this consists of changing variable names (like jquery.min.js). However, this isn't exclusive.
- Okay.
There's a reason I put "" as the second argument sent to loadstring. It's because it needs to be there. It's the chunk's name.
Not sure I know exactly what you mean. Why does my method of skipping the loadstring step altogether not work?
