Talk:Fansites: Difference between revisions

From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>Briguy9876
No edit summary
>Shagabash
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


::Dates and Alphabetical ordering are the two fairest ways to sort the list, but the date ordering isn't optimal, and most of the dates are guesswork by me. --[[User:Briguy9876|Briguy9876]] 18:23, 18 January 2012 (EST)
::Dates and Alphabetical ordering are the two fairest ways to sort the list, but the date ordering isn't optimal, and most of the dates are guesswork by me. --[[User:Briguy9876|Briguy9876]] 18:23, 18 January 2012 (EST)
:::Okay, I see your point there. {{User:Shagabash/sig|date=23:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 23:29, 18 January 2012

I'm still looking for better ways to upkeep this, as well as make it look nicer. Any ideas, questions, or concerns should go below.

--Briguy9876 23:46, 21 December 2011 (EST)

I did a couple of updates; one little thing I'm wondering about. Wouldn't it be appropriate for the current sites to be organized by date? I'd update it, but they might already be organized in some other way.. or maybe I should just resist my perfectionist tendencies..
Shagabash | PM | Talk | Contribs | 
01:46, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
There's two problems with that. 1. The way the table organizes dates isn't right. 2009 August will go before 2009 January. 2. It's a bit unfair for older blogs (although if they've been active this long then that's impressive) and it kinda gives a matter of "senority" to older blogs, which may not work. It's sorted alphabetically now, and someone is bound to come around with the "12'oBlock Roblox News" and be put on top, but that's for later.
Dates and Alphabetical ordering are the two fairest ways to sort the list, but the date ordering isn't optimal, and most of the dates are guesswork by me. --Briguy9876 18:23, 18 January 2012 (EST)
Okay, I see your point there.
Shagabash | PM | Talk | Contribs | 
23:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)