Talk:Event: Difference between revisions
>Legend26 |
>NXTBoy |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:"You might say it's not an instance, but technically it is. It's just not a subclass of the instance class" - In RBX.lua, we define an "Instance" to be an object that subclasses Instance, don't we? {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=21:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)}} | :"You might say it's not an instance, but technically it is. It's just not a subclass of the instance class" - In RBX.lua, we define an "Instance" to be an object that subclasses Instance, don't we? {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=21:10, 22 January 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
::Apparently not. [[RBX.lua.NetworkMarker (Service)]] <span style="font-size: 75%; line-height: inherit;">[[User:Legend26|Legend26]] ([[User talk:Legend26|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Legend26|contribs]])</span> 16:14, 22 January 2012 (EST) | ::Apparently not. [[RBX.lua.NetworkMarker (Service)]] <span style="font-size: 75%; line-height: inherit;">[[User:Legend26|Legend26]] ([[User talk:Legend26|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Legend26|contribs]])</span> 16:14, 22 January 2012 (EST) | ||
::I'm dubious about that as well. It's somewhat of a corner case, given that it has an Event member. Either we need a complete overhaul of the system (ugh), or we restrict the classification to apply to only derived classes of Instance. |
Revision as of 21:29, 22 January 2012
Oops. Maybe rename this "Events" since the page already exists. --GoldenUrg 05:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Also, this page shows up in the Category:Events page, which I don't want. How do I fix that? --GoldenUrg 05:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Using term "anonymous"
"Anonymous" doesn't sound right, when used in conjunction with the word "function." Is there a better substitute? Or is it just me?
- "Anonymous function" is a commonly used term for functions that aren't given names, see Wikipedia --SNCPlay42 18:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, k.
Change to object page?
Should we change this to an object page like format? (One for RBXScriptSignal and RBXScriptConnection) For one, it would look better and for two it's a lot easier to maintain a couple of method templates instead of this. You might say it's not an instance, but technically it is. It's just not a subclass of the instance class. I want input before I do this. Legend26 (talk | contribs) 15:54, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- It would be easier to maintain and everything, but it isn't an instance, so we shouldn't put it on an instance page.
- No. The object page format should be unique to objects. We want a clear distinction. This should take the same form as the CFrame and Vector3 pages. That's not to say that they can't be changed, but they should be consistent.
- "You might say it's not an instance, but technically it is. It's just not a subclass of the instance class" - In RBX.lua, we define an "Instance" to be an object that subclasses Instance, don't we?
- Apparently not. RBX.lua.NetworkMarker (Service) Legend26 (talk | contribs) 16:14, 22 January 2012 (EST)
- I'm dubious about that as well. It's somewhat of a corner case, given that it has an Event member. Either we need a complete overhaul of the system (ugh), or we restrict the classification to apply to only derived classes of Instance.