Talk:Event: Difference between revisions
>Blocco No edit summary |
>Legend26 →Change to object page?: new section |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:"Anonymous function" is a commonly used term for functions that aren't given names, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_function Wikipedia] --[[User:Sncplay42|SNCPlay42]] 18:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC) | :"Anonymous function" is a commonly used term for functions that aren't given names, see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_function Wikipedia] --[[User:Sncplay42|SNCPlay42]] 18:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
::Ah, k.<div style="border-style:dotted; border-width:0px; border-top-width:1px; border-color:#888888; padding-bottom:-4px;"><sup>Posted by [[:User:Blocco|blocco]] ([[:User_talk:Blocco|talk]]) on Aug 14, 2011 (Sunday) at 21:29 (UTC) [[:User talk:Blocco/sig#format|[Discuss format]]]</sup></div> | ::Ah, k.<div style="border-style:dotted; border-width:0px; border-top-width:1px; border-color:#888888; padding-bottom:-4px;"><sup>Posted by [[:User:Blocco|blocco]] ([[:User_talk:Blocco|talk]]) on Aug 14, 2011 (Sunday) at 21:29 (UTC) [[:User talk:Blocco/sig#format|[Discuss format]]]</sup></div> | ||
== Change to object page? == | |||
Should we change this to an object page like format? (One for RBXScriptSignal and RBXScriptConnection) For one, it would look better and for two it's a lot easier to maintain a couple of method templates instead of this. You might say it's not an instance, but technically it is. It's just not a subclass of the instance class. I want input before I do this. <span style="font-size: 75%; line-height: inherit;">[[User:Legend26|Legend26]] ([[User talk:Legend26|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Legend26|contribs]])</span> 15:54, 22 January 2012 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:54, 22 January 2012
Oops. Maybe rename this "Events" since the page already exists. --GoldenUrg 05:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Also, this page shows up in the Category:Events page, which I don't want. How do I fix that? --GoldenUrg 05:15, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Using term "anonymous"
"Anonymous" doesn't sound right, when used in conjunction with the word "function." Is there a better substitute? Or is it just me?
- "Anonymous function" is a commonly used term for functions that aren't given names, see Wikipedia --SNCPlay42 18:28, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, k.
Change to object page?
Should we change this to an object page like format? (One for RBXScriptSignal and RBXScriptConnection) For one, it would look better and for two it's a lot easier to maintain a couple of method templates instead of this. You might say it's not an instance, but technically it is. It's just not a subclass of the instance class. I want input before I do this. Legend26 (talk | contribs) 15:54, 22 January 2012 (EST)
