Talk:Bevels (Enum): Difference between revisions
From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>Anaminus No edit summary |
>ArceusInator ... |
||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
:I'd still like to see these referenced in some way, they still exist :P. {{User:Outofspace/sig}} | :I'd still like to see these referenced in some way, they still exist :P. {{User:Outofspace/sig}} | ||
::You're in luck. Someone needs to complete [[Settings|this]]. --[[User:Anaminus|Anaminus]] 10:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | ::You're in luck. Someone needs to complete [[Settings|this]]. --[[User:Anaminus|Anaminus]] 10:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Wait--What?! I just made a page for AASamples without knowing this. This REALLY needs to be posted somewhere other than the talk for a non-existent page. --ArceusInator 21:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:09, 27 December 2010
I think Doom decided that we're not making pages for enums that were only made for the settings. Since we (someone) are (eventually) writing pages for the settings, the enums can be mentioned there. --Anaminus 08:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not quite sure what you mean... I remember cleaning out some (but not all) of the Enum pages. Are you saying that this page needs to go or that it should stay? MINDRAKER 08:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Basically, yes, they should go. Any enum page where the enum is used for a setting (Bevels, Shadows, AASamples, etc) can be mentioned in on the related setting instead, since there's no chance that it will be used for different properties, like NormalId or TopBottom. --Anaminus 08:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- What about an entire enum page that we can attach to the settings? ⇒OutOfSpace 08:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- What about the Enum pages that have nothing linking to them? MINDRAKER 09:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- By settings I don't mean properties. There are certain enums that are used to change your roblox settings, such as turning your shadows on or off. Those are the ones that should be deleted. Then there are enums that are used for properties in the lua objects, like Part uses the InputType and the SurfaceType enums. Those are the ones that shouldn't be deleted. --Anaminus 09:13, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- What about the Enum pages that have nothing linking to them? MINDRAKER 09:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- What about an entire enum page that we can attach to the settings? ⇒OutOfSpace 08:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Basically, yes, they should go. Any enum page where the enum is used for a setting (Bevels, Shadows, AASamples, etc) can be mentioned in on the related setting instead, since there's no chance that it will be used for different properties, like NormalId or TopBottom. --Anaminus 08:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry. Here's a list: --Anaminus 09:28, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Don't delete:
- BinType
- CameraType
- ControllerType
- FormFactor
- InOut
- InputType
- JointType
- LeftRight
- MeshType
- NormalId
- PartType
- ReverbType
- SoundType
- SurfaceConstraint
- SurfaceType
- TopBottom
Delete/Don't make:
- AASamples
- ActionType
- AffectType
- Antialiasing
- Bevels
- ConcurrencyModel
- D3DDEVTYPE
- D3DFORMAT
- EnvironmentalPhysicsThrottle
- ErrorReporting
- Framerate Manager
- GraphicsMode
- KeywordFilterType
- PacketReliability
- PhysicsReceiveMethod
- PhysicsSendMethod
- ThreadPoolConfig
- TickCountSampleMethod
- Shadow
Thanks! I owe you one. Mindraker 09:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Wait--What?! I just made a page for AASamples without knowing this. This REALLY needs to be posted somewhere other than the talk for a non-existent page. --ArceusInator 21:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
