User talk:MrNicNac: Difference between revisions
>MrNicNac No edit summary |
>MrNicNac No edit summary |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:I can. Feel free to revert, MrNicNac, if you preferred it as it was before. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=16:13, 30 September 2011 (UTC)}} | :I can. Feel free to revert, MrNicNac, if you preferred it as it was before. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=16:13, 30 September 2011 (UTC)}} | ||
::Oops, misread that as can ''you'' make it. My bad. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=16:17, 30 September 2011 (UTC)}} | ::Oops, misread that as can ''you'' make it. My bad. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=16:17, 30 September 2011 (UTC)}} | ||
::Ah, thanks. I was going to ask one of you exactly how I could include both of them in one cell (is that the term?). --[[User talk:MrNicNac|<font color="#007BA7" size="4">☩</font>]][[User:MrNicNac|<font color="#E52B50" size="3" face="Harlow Solid Italic">MrNicNac</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/MrNicNac|<font color="#007BA7" size="4">☩</font>]] 11:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC) | :::Ah, thanks. I was going to ask one of you exactly how I could include both of them in one cell (is that the term?). --[[User talk:MrNicNac|<font color="#007BA7" size="4">☩</font>]][[User:MrNicNac|<font color="#E52B50" size="3" face="Harlow Solid Italic">MrNicNac</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/MrNicNac|<font color="#007BA7" size="4">☩</font>]] 11:45, 1 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:45, 1 October 2011
Your Page
I like the formatting and style you use. Nice work. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 16:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks? I suppose I tried to make it look like a book page (to an extent). --☩MrNicNac ☩ 17:20, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
"Since when does your jurisdiction rule over mine? We have equal say here, and it is competition."
I'm not saying my jurisdiction rules over yours. I didn't mean that in an aggressive way.
However, the <center>
elemtent has been deprecated since HTML 4. HTML 4.01 became a W3C recommendation in December 1999. That makes your code almost 12 years out of date. Here's what Wikipedia says about deprecation (emphasis is my own):
- Deprecation is a status applied to software features to indicate that they should be avoided, typically because they have been superseded. Although deprecated features remain in the software, their use may raise warning messages recommending alternative practices, and deprecation may indicate that the feature will be removed in the future. Features are deprecated—rather than immediately removed—in order to provide backward compatibility, and give programmers who have used the feature time to bring their code into compliance with the new standard.
The web doesn't advance if people don't drop deprecated technologies. I'm not trying to one-up you here. As a web developer, I'm just trying to help move the internet forward.
- That's very noble of you, helping the web advance and all, but until I am completely unable to use it then there is no reason why I should avoid it. If it were to somehow become unusable or unstable, that is a different tale. As long as I am sure the code I write won't have its functions disabled, then I don't see how using it should affect anyone. For now, it does exactly what I wrote it to do. --☩MrNicNac ☩ 22:22, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Just so you know
Looking at TomTom's page, I feel I can upload 6 pictures to make a skybox.... which will most likely be used by a ton of people. I will include it in an article too. OK? - Quenty (talk • September 25)
- You're not supposed to, but including it in an article is a loophole. So you should be fine. It doesn't bother me. --☩MrNicNac ☩ 22:48, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
- I think someone said we shouldn't upload images that are going to be used in game (which readers will probably use them for) because the wiki can't handle nearly as many requests as the main site. I'm not sure if that's true or not, but I think you should just upload them on the main site and link to the decals instead of uploading them here. »ArceusInator 20:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Fixing positioning of elements
Can I make it so the outdated/need reviewing span is at the same level as the bio span?