Template talk:Method: Difference between revisions
>JulienDethurens |
>JulienDethurens |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Methods don't show the "In Object" category for some reason... {{User:flurite/signature|date=11:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)}} | Methods don't show the "In Object" category for some reason... {{User:flurite/signature|date=11:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)}} | ||
:You're right... Yet, I was sure I had checked if everything was fine. Gonna fix it, sorry. --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 14:58, 9 April 2012 (EDT) | :You're right... Yet, I was sure I had checked if everything was fine. Gonna fix it, sorry. --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 14:58, 9 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
::Fixed. --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 15:05, 9 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:05, 9 April 2012
Could an editor make this template skip the redirect in the object part and make it link directly to the "RBX.lua.Object_(Object)" page? Sometimes, the page with the same name as the object's name is a disambiguation page or something else. Some examples are the Toolbar page(used with plugins) and the Instance page (a disambiguation page). Instead, they should link to the RBX.lua.Object_(Object) page directly.
The objects argument
I strongly disagree with considering a method (or a property, or an event) as belonging to many different objects, as that is not possible and is not the case. I believe we should just make a different page for each of them, just like what we do already with certain of them. Considering them as being the same method is just wrong. --JulienDethurens 19:13, 7 April 2012 (EDT)
Messed up template...?
Methods don't show the "In Object" category for some reason... Flurite - 11:46, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- You're right... Yet, I was sure I had checked if everything was fine. Gonna fix it, sorry. --JulienDethurens 14:58, 9 April 2012 (EDT)
- Fixed. --JulienDethurens 15:05, 9 April 2012 (EDT)
