Talk:Functions

Creating a Part section too specific or a useful example? --GoldenUrg 04:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

The {{type}} template

I think we should be a bit more thoughtful about the use of this template. Just because "function" is a type does not mean all occurrences of the word "function" represent said type.

NXTBoy (talk • contribs)

19:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Hm, you're right. I think we should consider talking about functions as not represent the type directly, while considering saying something is of a certain type as representing the type directly. Therefore, in "Functions are used to [...]", "Functions" would not be considered as a type, while, in "the blahblah argument must be a function or a string and[...]", "function" would be considered as a type. As for "the wait function", I think it shouldn't be considered as a type, because you are talking about a specific function.

JulienDethurens

15 February 2012