Talk:Reusing code: Difference between revisions
From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>NecroBumpist →Should we delete?: new section |
>Quenty No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The [[Functions]] page seems to describe everything in this page, but in a better manner. Also, I don't think the info about _G sharing values across scripts still holds true. So, should we delete in favor of / redirect to the [[Functions]] page? [[User:NecroBumpist|NecroBumpist]] 15:19, 14 April 2012 (EDT) | The [[Functions]] page seems to describe everything in this page, but in a better manner. Also, I don't think the info about _G sharing values across scripts still holds true. So, should we delete in favor of / redirect to the [[Functions]] page? [[User:NecroBumpist|NecroBumpist]] 15:19, 14 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
:Perhaps a redirect, or just a short informative page, with a link to functions. {{User:Quenty/sig|date=April 15}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:44, 15 April 2012
Using the Code Tag (JulienDethurens)
Yeah, woops. I just copied the whole page and threw it in WordPad so i could use the find and replace method. †MrNicNac - Senior Wiki Editor †
Parameters and Arguments
Do you guys consider using parameters and arguments as reusing code as well? Flurite - 12:12, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- It doesn't exactly classify as reusing code, but is part of reused code. But yet, it could be a sub-section to make the reused code more dynamic and usable in more situations. †MrNicNac - Senior Wiki Editor †
Should we delete?
The Functions page seems to describe everything in this page, but in a better manner. Also, I don't think the info about _G sharing values across scripts still holds true. So, should we delete in favor of / redirect to the Functions page? NecroBumpist 15:19, 14 April 2012 (EDT)
