Talk:RBX.lua.ROOT (Object): Difference between revisions
From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>JulienDethurens Keeping This |
>Legend26 |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Also, should I set the Instance object's superclass to this? It <em>is</em> the superclass of Instance, but, still... <div style="border-top:1px dashed;padding-bottom:.5em;height:1em"><div style="font-size:75%;float:left">[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]]</div><div style="font-size:75%;float:right">15 February 2012</div></div> | Also, should I set the Instance object's superclass to this? It <em>is</em> the superclass of Instance, but, still... <div style="border-top:1px dashed;padding-bottom:.5em;height:1em"><div style="font-size:75%;float:left">[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]]</div><div style="font-size:75%;float:right">15 February 2012</div></div> | ||
:I'd say just keep it, but make a note about the name having the greater/smaller signs in the description or people may think it's a wiki error or not notice at all. As to changing the instance's superclass page, I'd say yes, but the only benefit really is that a person could click the "extends" button until they arrive here. <span style="font-size: 75%; line-height: inherit;">[[User:Legend26|Legend26]] ([[User talk:Legend26|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Legend26|contribs]])</span> 22:40, 14 February 2012 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:40, 15 February 2012
Keeping This
Should we keep this page? The first problem is that it doesn't exactly have the correct name, as the correct name is <<<ROOT>>>. I also don't really think the object template should be used with such pages. We should have a such page, but, if so, it probably shouldn't use the object template, because it has no members.
Also, should I set the Instance object's superclass to this? It is the superclass of Instance, but, still...
15 February 2012
- I'd say just keep it, but make a note about the name having the greater/smaller signs in the description or people may think it's a wiki error or not notice at all. As to changing the instance's superclass page, I'd say yes, but the only benefit really is that a person could click the "extends" button until they arrive here. Legend26 (talk | contribs) 22:40, 14 February 2012 (EST)
