Talk:Functions: Difference between revisions
From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>GoldenUrg delete section? |
>JulienDethurens |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Creating a Part section too specific or a useful example? --[[User:GoldenUrg|GoldenUrg]] 04:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | Creating a Part section too specific or a useful example? --[[User:GoldenUrg|GoldenUrg]] 04:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
== The {{tl|type}} template == | |||
I think we should be a bit more thoughtful about the use of this template. Just because "function" is a type does not mean all occurrences of the word "function" represent said type. {{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=19:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)}} | |||
:Hm, you're right. I think we should consider talking about functions as not represent the type directly, while considering saying something is of a certain type as representing the type directly. Therefore, in "Functions are used to [...]", "Functions" would not be considered as a type, while, in "the blahblah argument must be a function or a string and[...]", "function" would be considered as a type. As for "the wait function", I think it shouldn't be considered as a type, because you are talking about a specific function. <div style="border-top:1px dashed;padding-bottom:.5em;height:1em"><div style="font-size:75%;float:left">[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]]</div><div style="font-size:75%;float:right">15 February 2012</div></div> | |||
Latest revision as of 22:16, 15 February 2012
Creating a Part section too specific or a useful example? --GoldenUrg 04:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
The {{type}} template
I think we should be a bit more thoughtful about the use of this template. Just because "function" is a type does not mean all occurrences of the word "function" represent said type.
- Hm, you're right. I think we should consider talking about functions as not represent the type directly, while considering saying something is of a certain type as representing the type directly. Therefore, in "Functions are used to [...]", "Functions" would not be considered as a type, while, in "the blahblah argument must be a function or a string and[...]", "function" would be considered as a type. As for "the wait function", I think it shouldn't be considered as a type, because you are talking about a specific function. 15 February 2012
