Template talk:Function: Difference between revisions
From Legacy Roblox Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
>Quenty I DID IT! |
>JulienDethurens |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:Hum, I suppose nobody got the time to read this before it got taken off the recent changes... I need to edit this page. :/ <div style="border-top:1px dashed;padding-bottom:.5em;height:1em"><div style="font-size:75%;float:left">[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]]</div><div style="font-size:75%;float:right">3 February 2012</div></div> | :Hum, I suppose nobody got the time to read this before it got taken off the recent changes... I need to edit this page. :/ <div style="border-top:1px dashed;padding-bottom:.5em;height:1em"><div style="font-size:75%;float:left">[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]]</div><div style="font-size:75%;float:right">3 February 2012</div></div> | ||
::I did it. {{User:Quenty/sig|date=February 3}} | ::I did it. {{User:Quenty/sig|date=February 3}} | ||
:::I was talking about THIS page, the redirect page. Not the Template:Method page, the Template:Function one. :P <div style="border-top:1px dashed;padding-bottom:.5em;height:1em"><div style="font-size:75%;float:left">[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]]</div><div style="font-size:75%;float:right">3 February 2012</div></div> |
Latest revision as of 06:04, 3 February 2012
Categorization issue
You REALLY need to remove this line from this template:
<includeonly>[[Category:Functions]] __NOTOC__ </includeonly>
It's causing all the objects to be listed under the Functions category. Which is rather silly behavior
Little fix
Can you add to the {{{returns}}} variable so that it is {{{returns|n/a}}}? --Blocco|Userpage-Talkpage 02:50, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Actually, it should be `nil`, since in lua, that is the return value of a function that does not return a value. @Mr Doom Bringer, can you give us writers edit rights to these templates? They've still got a couple of bugs.
Protection
Could someone unprotect this page? I want to use it for something.
- Hum, I suppose nobody got the time to read this before it got taken off the recent changes... I need to edit this page. :/ 3 February 2012