Talk:Help: Difference between revisions
>Tenal No edit summary |
>NXTBoy →Tables as Layout: Indentation fail |
||
(22 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Change this Page == | == Change this Page == | ||
Should we not change this page to be redirected to something more appropriate? {{User:Quenty/sig|date=March 16}} | Should we not change this page to be redirected to something more appropriate? {{User:Quenty/sig|date=March 16}} | ||
:Especially since emails redirect to it? | :Especially since emails redirect to it? {{User:Quenty/sig|date=April 12}} | ||
::Do emails really redirect to it? If so, we really have to do something. [[User:Tenal|Tenal]] 00:15, 13 April 2012 (EDT) | ::Do emails really redirect to it? If so, we really have to do something. [[User:Tenal|Tenal]] 00:15, 13 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
:::Emails from [mailto:[email protected] [email protected]] actually give links to this? If so, then I'd even say redirecting this page to something more useful is an emergency. I'll write some sort of portal that gives links to other articles about various things. --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 00:45, 13 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
::::What do you think about [[User:JulienDethurens/Draft|this]]? I'd add more things in it if I had more icons, but I don't and I don't want to use many times the same icon since that makes it look ugly (look on the main page if you want to see what I mean...). --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 01:45, 13 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
:::::Not just the repetition of the icons; the quality of them as well. Add a bit more margin. [[User:Tenal|Tenal]] 02:43, 13 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
::::::Can't do much about the quality of the icons. I'm not really that good at image editing.As for margin.. hm.. --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 03:30, 13 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
{{Outdent|::::::}} | |||
Oh, also, use [[File:Roblox_icon_rendered.png|this|20px]] instead of the current one you have. [[User:Tenal|Tenal]] 04:00, 13 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
== Tables as Layout == | |||
We all know how wrong it is. All current browsers support [http://reference.sitepoint.com/css/display display:table] properties, [http://caniuse.com/css-table except for IE 6 and 7]. However, the combined usage share of 6 and 7 is [http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-monthly-201104-201204 less than 5%]. Is that low enough to make the switch? --[[User:Anaminus|Anaminus]] 19:15, 27 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
:I hate using table for layouts, but I still did so. Why? To be consistent with the rest of the wiki. If you decide to change them all (including the main page, might require a dev to approve, though) to not use tables, I am <strong>completely</strong> agreeing with you. However, since I didn't really want to change the main page and every other part of the wiki that uses tables, I decided to just be consistent and use tables even though I really felt wrong while doing it. If it had been on a real website, then I would just have not created the page at all or changed the whole website. But, since it's on a wiki... --[[User:JulienDethurens|JulienDethurens]] 20:50, 27 April 2012 (EDT) | |||
::the {{`|display:table}} properties are incomplete in all browsers. I don't think the spec itself even provides enough to completely replace any table with equivalent CSS formatting. This page, however, probably could be done with them. Tables are used here because this type of layout is actually REALLY DIFFICULT to achieve with floats and other CSS tricks. I didn't see much point using display:table properties, particularly since [[User_talk:NXTBoy#DIV_verses_Table|MDB told me not to on my talk page]]: | |||
::<blockquote>IE6 is mandatory support, I run all of my page tests through a VM running WinXP and IE6 not updated for years. DIVs are fun stuff, but not the kind of fun I want to deal with supporting. ---User:Mr Doom Bringer (Talk) 00:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)</blockquote> | |||
::{{User:NXTBoy/sig|date=09:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)}} |
Latest revision as of 09:33, 28 April 2012
WHY CAN I BUILD A HOUSE AND IT WONT BE THEIR WEN I GO INTO ONINE VIST ITS NOT >
Well, you need in-game help.
Edited: added everything, used information from Wikipedia, which is used under the GNU Free Documentation License.
--Mr Doom Bringer 21:40, 23 November 2006 (CST) were do i get the latest graphic drives???
Ok.. to make things clearer...
This is just a page that is intended for help with the Wiki, not the game.
If you have a question, PM Telamon or me (MrDoomBringer). Either he or I will make a page about it, or send you a direct answer.
Yes, this is the wrong place to ask for in-game help. --N2KC 15:30, 22 March 2008 (CDT)
How
How can I make a Page??? --Gavin12 17:45, 29 August 2008 (CDT) File:Bricksmith-54x75.jpg
Change this Page
Should we not change this page to be redirected to something more appropriate? - Quenty (talk • March 16)
- Especially since emails redirect to it? - Quenty (talk • April 12)
- Do emails really redirect to it? If so, we really have to do something. Tenal 00:15, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- Emails from [email protected] actually give links to this? If so, then I'd even say redirecting this page to something more useful is an emergency. I'll write some sort of portal that gives links to other articles about various things. --JulienDethurens 00:45, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- What do you think about this? I'd add more things in it if I had more icons, but I don't and I don't want to use many times the same icon since that makes it look ugly (look on the main page if you want to see what I mean...). --JulienDethurens 01:45, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- Not just the repetition of the icons; the quality of them as well. Add a bit more margin. Tenal 02:43, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- Can't do much about the quality of the icons. I'm not really that good at image editing.As for margin.. hm.. --JulienDethurens 03:30, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- Not just the repetition of the icons; the quality of them as well. Add a bit more margin. Tenal 02:43, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- What do you think about this? I'd add more things in it if I had more icons, but I don't and I don't want to use many times the same icon since that makes it look ugly (look on the main page if you want to see what I mean...). --JulienDethurens 01:45, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- Emails from [email protected] actually give links to this? If so, then I'd even say redirecting this page to something more useful is an emergency. I'll write some sort of portal that gives links to other articles about various things. --JulienDethurens 00:45, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
- Do emails really redirect to it? If so, we really have to do something. Tenal 00:15, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
Oh, also, use instead of the current one you have. Tenal 04:00, 13 April 2012 (EDT)
Tables as Layout
We all know how wrong it is. All current browsers support display:table properties, except for IE 6 and 7. However, the combined usage share of 6 and 7 is less than 5%. Is that low enough to make the switch? --Anaminus 19:15, 27 April 2012 (EDT)
- I hate using table for layouts, but I still did so. Why? To be consistent with the rest of the wiki. If you decide to change them all (including the main page, might require a dev to approve, though) to not use tables, I am completely agreeing with you. However, since I didn't really want to change the main page and every other part of the wiki that uses tables, I decided to just be consistent and use tables even though I really felt wrong while doing it. If it had been on a real website, then I would just have not created the page at all or changed the whole website. But, since it's on a wiki... --JulienDethurens 20:50, 27 April 2012 (EDT)
- the display:table properties are incomplete in all browsers. I don't think the spec itself even provides enough to completely replace any table with equivalent CSS formatting. This page, however, probably could be done with them. Tables are used here because this type of layout is actually REALLY DIFFICULT to achieve with floats and other CSS tricks. I didn't see much point using display:table properties, particularly since MDB told me not to on my talk page:
IE6 is mandatory support, I run all of my page tests through a VM running WinXP and IE6 not updated for years. DIVs are fun stuff, but not the kind of fun I want to deal with supporting. ---User:Mr Doom Bringer (Talk) 00:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)